I agree with Jim that after flagging a user from neighborhood watch, I’d like to be sent back to the NW page to review the next account. In some “controversial” cases – i.e. if an account gets both “suspend” and “keep” votes – I’d like to know about the other Neighborhood Watchers’ comments and about the final decision.
Furthermore: why not ban certain goals? I’ve been flagging down a lot of “hack and find out passwords”, “be(come) a hitman”, ”... gaia gold …”. I suppose that goals that include an URL could also be banned.
A next step up would be the integration of automated content quality management on the site – think of Mollom or a similar tool. I suppose that this would help a lot when the Neighborhood watch process is too slow: in keeping Zeitgeist clean(er) from spam!
I’d finally like to have a communication channel about Neighborhood watch, to discuss and resolve cases that often lead to controversy (like rappers submitting lyrics, teenage mermaids etc).
Respond |
Cheer this |
4 months ago ()